Hi There,
This is a bit of a strange one!
My previous landlord got into difficulties with the mortgage and LPA receivers were instructed. The receivers issued me a notice under section 21. Since then, the landlord/owner sold the property but somehow managed to keep the mortgage in his name. A new tenancy agreement was issued by my new landlord who is now the registered owner, this has been proven by land registry records. The problem I have is that the receivers are insisting that the section 21 is still valid and the are going to apply for possession.
I'm all confused by this. Surely, my landlord is the NEW OWNER but as the mortgage has stayed with the previous owner, is this section 21 notice valid?
Please help me with legal facts not opinions as this is a very serious matter!
Thanks
lookingforanswers
This is a bit of a strange one!
My previous landlord got into difficulties with the mortgage and LPA receivers were instructed. The receivers issued me a notice under section 21. Since then, the landlord/owner sold the property but somehow managed to keep the mortgage in his name. A new tenancy agreement was issued by my new landlord who is now the registered owner, this has been proven by land registry records. The problem I have is that the receivers are insisting that the section 21 is still valid and the are going to apply for possession.
I'm all confused by this. Surely, my landlord is the NEW OWNER but as the mortgage has stayed with the previous owner, is this section 21 notice valid?
Please help me with legal facts not opinions as this is a very serious matter!
Thanks
lookingforanswers